We Have a New Home! Please Click Below to Go to the New Freedom’s Lighthouse!


Blog Archive

Friday, May 7, 2010

Ann Coulter On O'Reilly Talks About the Media's Sympathy for the Times Square Bomber - Video 5/7/10

Ann Coulter appears on the O'Reilly Factor to discuss the media's sympathetic attitude toward the suspected Times Square bomber, and the fact that they are going out of their way to ignore his connections to Islamic terrorism.

Coulter said the media is still "working through their grief of the car bomber not being a Tea Partier," and that what it all boils down to is "Liberals always root for savages against civilization."


Blind Eye Jones,  May 8, 2010 at 2:53 AM  

Liberals will always root for barbarians over civilization. Why? Because barbarians are not bourgeois philistines. Which means that the natural in the barbarian is always sided with -- whether it is natural urges to kill, maim, have sex with anything that moves, etc. -- over the uptight, plagued with conventions, civilized citizen. So liberals see the barbarian as a corrective to society, the noble savage is far superior to the Wall Street trader or CEO. The noble savage is attractive to the liberal as winter is attractive to a person looking out of his window in a warm house, who doesn't have to shovel the driveway and die of a heart attack. Liberals are romantic and these views are a luxury that only romantics, who despise their own uptightedness, can afford to indulge in. In their mind nature is never against man. Whereas, the whole civilized quest of man is to conquer nature so that he can live longer in comfort, suffer less diseases, and not die at at ridiculously young age that nature may have in store for him. Yes, these liberals are romantics thinking that capitalistic bourgeois society needs a corrective: call it communism, call it psychotherapy, call it art -- whatever gets the modern man in touch with his natural self, his "feelings" that he left behind in the state of nature. They forget that nature, according to Hobbes, was war of all against all and that life was short, nasty and brutish. Rousseau wins out with his view of man as a compassionate animal in the state of nature. Liberals love Rousseau: they don't have to be torn between their natural urges and societies restrictive norms, taboos and conventions. Rousseau has given them license to do and be whatever is naturally them. There are no moral restrictions in nature. And we have to remember that the terror of the French Revolution was inspired by Rousseau. But the important point is that this attitude is a luxury: liberalism is a luxury, liberals hatred for themselves and society is a luxury. Why? We tolerate it.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP